Hermeneutic, Comparative, and Syncretic Philosophy: Or, On Ricoeurian, Confucian and Aztec Philosophy

Auteurs-es

  • Sebastian Purcell SUNY at Cortland

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2020.935

Mots-clés :

Hermeneutics, Ricoeur, Confucius, Aztecs, World Philosophy, Heidegger

Résumé

Hermeneutic philosophy, and Paul Ricoeur’s formulation of hermeneutics in particular, faces a serious challenge, not from external sources, but from internal proponents of the program. In what might be called the Collapse Challenge, Ricoeur’s understanding of the hermeneutic circle is criticized for making use of structuralist methods that are no longer considered viable. Rather than look to replace Ricoeur’s work with an external model, the present essay draws on his late model of translation to suggest two viable paths forward beyond the Collapse Challenge. To develop these paths, the essay gives two concrete cases, one using Confucian philosophy, which is comparative, another using Aztec philosophy, which is syncretic.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Sebastian Purcell, SUNY at Cortland

Associate Professor of Philosophy at the State University of New York at Cortland.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2020-12-04

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles