Recognizability, Perception and the Distribution of the Sensible: Rancière, Honneth and Butler

Danielle Petherbridge

Abstract


This paper explores the relation between perception, invizibilization and recognizability in the work of Rancière, Honneth and Butler. Recognizability is the term employed here to indicate the perceptual process that necessarily occurs prior to a normative or ethical act of recognition and that provides the conditions that make recognition possible. The notion of recognizability points to the fact that perception is not merely a disinterested surveying of the perceptual field but indicates that it is already evaluative in the sense that others are immediately distinguishable from other objects. When a failure of recognizability occurs, it is not due to the fact that the other has not been seen in a literal sense but instead that she has been intentionally ignored or invisibilized. The suggestion made here is that despite their different approaches, a comparison and dialogue between these three thinkers highlights the importance of this constellation of issues for critical theory. 


Keywords


Rancière; Honneth; Butler; perception; invisibility; recognizability; Critical Theor; Frankfurt School

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2019.894



Copyright (c) 2019 Danielle Petherbridge

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.